Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Hulme v. Donnelly

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Affirmance, Aokbrson, Bergen, Chancedlor, Cueiajvl, Gardner, Heppüntieimer, Justioe, Kadiscií, Kat, Mlntürn, None, Parker, Reversal, Taylor, Trexcirard, White, Williams, Zenbacu

95 N.J.L. 545; 112 A. 498; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 148

Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiajvl

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.