Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey February 28, 1921

Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co., 95 N.J.L. 545 (N.J. 1921)

113 A. 927; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 149

Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Blaok, Chanobllor, Cubiam, Gardner, Hbppeni, Ieimer, Justioe, Kat, Minturn, Nalisch, None, Reversal, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams, Zenbaci

Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNobllor, Chief Justioe, TRENCHard, BergeN, MiNturN,' Nalisch, BlaoK, Kat-zeNbaCI-i, White, HbppeNI-ieiMer, Williams, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: LOUIS SOLOMON v. NEW JERSEY INDEMNITY COMPANY
Status: Published