Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.

Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Blaok, Chanobllor, Cubiam, Gardner, Hbppeni, Ieimer, Justioe, Kat, Minturn, Nalisch, None, Reversal, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams, Zenbaci
95 N.J.L. 545; 113 A. 927; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 149

Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNobllor, Chief Justioe, TRENCHard, BergeN, MiNturN,' Nalisch, BlaoK, Kat-zeNbaCI-i, White, HbppeNI-ieiMer, Williams, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑