State v. Stiles

Supreme Court of New Jersey February 28, 1921

State v. Stiles, 95 N.J.L. 550 (N.J. 1921)

113 A. 610; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 152

Affirmance, Aokbeson, Barker, Bergen, Garuneu, Heppenheimer, Katzenbacii, None, Pee, Reversal, Swayzb, Tard, Taylor, Trenci, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of this present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this unit of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

*551

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNCellor, Swayzb, TreNCI-tard, BARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACII, WHITE, HePPENHEIMER, WilliaMs, Taylor, GaruNeu, AokbesoN, JJ. 13.

Reference

Full Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IN ERROR v. CHARLES STILES, IN ERROR
Status: Published