Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

State v. Stiles

State v. Stiles
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Affirmance, Aokbeson, Barker, Bergen, Garuneu, Heppenheimer, Katzenbacii, None, Pee, Reversal, Swayzb, Tard, Taylor, Trenci, White, Williams
95 N.J.L. 550; 113 A. 610; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 152

State v. Stiles

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of this present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this unit of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

*551For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNCellor, Swayzb, TreNCI-tard, BARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACII, WHITE, HePPENHEIMER, WilliaMs, Taylor, GaruNeu, AokbesoN, JJ. 13.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.