Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Wild v. Cahill

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Affirmance, Aokeeson, Bergen, Black, Cürtam, Gardker, Heppbnheimbe, Kalisoh, Katzenbach, Mlnturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayzb, Taylor, Trenchaed, White, Williams

95 N.J.L. 557; 113 A. 257; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 155

Counsel

For the appellants, William P. Hurley., For the respondent, James B. Nugeni.

Opinion of the Court

PER CüRTAM.

The judgment nnder review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Guarniere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, TreNCHAed, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTURN, KaLISOH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, White, HeppbNHEimbe, WilliaMS, Taylor, Gardker, AoKEesoN, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.