Kauffeld v. G. F. Pfund & Sons
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Neylon v. Ford Motor Company (N.J. 1952)
- Alexander Orr, Jr., Inc. v. Florida Industrial Comm. (Fla. 1937)
- Ciocca v. National Sugar Refining Co. of N.J. (N.J. 1940)
- Ballinger v. Wagaraw Building Supply Co. (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas 1938)
- Richter v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (N.J. 1937)
- Rubeo v. Arthur McMullen Co. (N.J. 1937)
- Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co. (N.J. 1937)
- Essbee Amusement Corp. v. Greenhaus (N.J. 1935)
- Pikus v. American Fur Dyeing Co. (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau 1935)
- Fogg v. Van Saun Coal Co. (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau 1934)
- Higham v. Preakness Hills Country Club (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review' herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court; except that the Supreme Court made an error In holding that the deceased’s employment necessitated his entering the defendant’s smoke-house. The Court of Common Pleas, whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed, held that he did not enter the smoke-house. And the rule is that the Supreme Court may not review the facts as found by the Common Pleas in these eases when there is any evidence to support the lower court’s findings; and there was in this case.
On the whole case there was sufficient evidence to warrant the judgments arrived at both in the Co¡mmon Pleas and
For (affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Cm he Justice, Trench Attn, Bergen, Mlnturn, Kaltscii, Kateenbach, White, IIeppenh'eiaier, Willlams, Gardner, Acjecerson, Van Bijskirií, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.