Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922

Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 2, 1922 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirii, Gardner, Iiee, Iite, Kalisch, Katzenbact, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Tiie, Trenohard, Williams

93 N.J. Eq. 486; 8 Stock. 486; 116 A. 869; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 320

Counsel

Messrs. Parker, Emery S Van Riper, for1 the appellants., Mr. James B. Furber, Mr. Samuel Herman and Mr. Casimiro Seoppettone.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

*491

For affirmance — Tiie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbact-i, Wi-iite, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yak Buskirii — 13. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.