Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922

Siebold v. Zieboldt

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 9, 1922 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Gardner, Ige, Iief, Just, Kalisch, Katzenbagh, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Williams

93 N.J. Eq. 500; 8 Stock. 500; 116 A. 926; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 323

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for- the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. - ■ ■•• •

For .affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iief-Just-IGE, Swayze, TrencHard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbagh, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.