Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922

Swedesboro National Bank v. Richman

Swedesboro National Bank v. Richman
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 9, 1922 · Ackersoií, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Gardner, Iard, Iief, Kalisch, Katzbnbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenci, Williams
93 N.J. Eq. 502; 8 Stock. 502; 116 A. 926; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 325

Swedesboro National Bank v. Richman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed, by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court below.

For affirmance — The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackersoií, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.