Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922

F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 28, 1922 · Affirmance, Aokerson, Bersbn, Black, Buskirk, Chibe, Gardner, Heppenrieimer, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Williams

93 N.J. Eq. 657; 117 A. 146; 8 Stock. 657; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated' in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — -Trie Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bersbn, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenrieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — -None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.