F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol

Supreme Court of New Jersey April 28, 1922

F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol, 93 N.J. Eq. 657 (N.J. 1922)

117 A. 146; 8 Stock. 657; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345

Affirmance, Aokerson, Bersbn, Black, Buskirk, Chibe, Gardner, Heppenrieimer, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated' in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — -Trie Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bersbn, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenrieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — -None.

Reference

Full Case Name: The F. A. Cigol Rubber Company, a corporation, complainant-respondent v. Frank A. Cigol
Status: Published