Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922

City of Ventnor v. Fulmer

City of Ventnor v. Fulmer
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 28, 1922 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Gardner, Iard, Kalisch, Katzenbaci, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenci, White, Williams
93 N.J. Eq. 660; 117 A. 925; 8 Stock. 660; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346

City of Ventnor v. Fulmer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.