Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922

Kenney v. King

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 20, 1922 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Bus, Gardner, Heppenheimer, Katzenraoi, Kirk, Lack, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenohard, White, Williams

93 N.J. Eq. 688; 118 A. 634; 8 Stock. 688; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the finding of facts by the vice-chancellor and the propriety of the deciee based on those facts. The decree is therefore affirmed. ■

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. .... For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.