Battin v. Battin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Battin v. Battin, 94 N.J. Eq. 497 (N.J. 1923)

Battin v. Battin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record in this case, with the result that we have reached the same conclusion as the learned vice-chancellor, who advised the decree in which the respective rights and interest of the parties in the premises are ascertained and adjudged. Also, the bill filed for a partition and a decree of sale of the premises should be sustained.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—-The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, White, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—11.

For reversal—None.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hamilton S. Battin, complainant-respondent v. Jennie Mae Battin and Lambert Earle Battin
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published