Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1923

Linnekogel v. Linnekogel

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 11, 1923 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Heppeniibimer, Iiee, Kaliscii, Katzbnbaci, Minturn, Parker, Reversal, Trenciiard, White

95 N.J. Eq. 265; 10 Stock. 265; 122 A. 372; 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bentley in the court of chancery.

For affirmance■—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Minturn, Kaliscii, Heppeniibimer—3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.