Baunach v. Liebman
Baunach v. Liebman
98 N.J.L. 554; 119 A. 629; 1923 N.J. LEXIS 246
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tins Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Whyte, Ueppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.