Neither after consideration of the facts, nor of the law involved in this case, are we disposed to disturb the judgment appealed from; for, as was sagely remarked by Lord Coke, "ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus.” Co. Litt. 10a; Ippollilo v. Ridgefield, 94 N. J. L. 97; Headley v. Cavelier, 82 N. J. L. 637; Jersey City Supply Co. v. Jersey City 71 Id. 631; Ocean Gily v. Shriver, 64 Id. 550.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 16

For reversal — None.