Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Howarth v. Teunon

Howarth v. Teunon
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 19, 1925 · Chief-Justice, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays
97 N.J. Eq. 364; 127 A. 338; 12 Stock. 364; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 541

Counsel

Mr. Richard S. Wilson , for the respondent. Mr. Martin P. Devlin , for the appellant.

Howarth v. Teunon

Opinion of the Court

*365 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

*366 Mr. Richard 8. Wilson, for the resjiondent. Mr. Marlin P. Devlin, for the appellant. For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal—-None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.