Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Holloway v. Hendrick

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

98 N.J. Eq. 713; 13 Stock. 713; 129 A. 702; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 587

Counsel

“The voluminous brief and reply brief filed on behalf of the defendants set up other matters of defense which I do not consider of sufficient merit even to discuss., Mr. George B. Beach and Mr. Thomas G. Haight, for the complainant., Mr. Frank Hendrick and Mrs. Katherine F. M. Hendrick, pro sese.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cukiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Pielder.

*719 ■For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlhnnon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.