Sutton v. Champion
Sutton v. Champion
129 A. 923; 101 N.J.L. 569; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 281
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenci-iard, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.