Tricolo v. Centalanza
Tricolo v. Centalanza
101 N.J.L. 569; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 282
Tricolo v. Centalanza
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.