Tricolo v. Centalanza

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Tricolo v. Centalanza, 101 N.J.L. 569 (N.J. 1925)
1925 N.J. LEXIS 282
PER CURIAM.

Tricolo v. Centalanza

Opinion of the Court

*570 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
John Tricolo, Respondent, v. Donato Centalanza, Appellant
Status
Published