Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Maturi v. Fay

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 18, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

98 N.J. Eq. 377; 13 Stock. 377; 129 A. 185; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 617

Counsel

Mr. Atwood C. Wolf , for the complainants-appellants. Mr. L. Edward Herrmann , for the defendants-respondents.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Lewis in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Black, Katzbnbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.