State v. Katz
State v. Katz
130 A. 920; 102 N.J.L. 224; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 325
State v. Katz
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.