State v. Katz
State v. Katz
130 A. 920; 102 N.J.L. 224; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 325
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.