Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Baumann v. Naugle

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 29, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

98 N.J. Eq. 687; 130 A. 917; 13 Stock. 687; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 603

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cuetam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Black, Katzenbaoi-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Bus kirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.