Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Brodman v. Rade

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 19, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

127 A. 249; 101 N.J.L. 207; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 203

Counsel

For the appellant, Eugene T. Sharkey. For the respondent, Lazarus, Brenner Vickers.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Cutler in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 212

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.