Arthur v. Arthur
Arthur v. Arthur
98 N.J. Eq. 393; 129 A. 178; 13 Stock. 393; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 614
Opinion of the Court
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for-the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Grey.
*404 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, KatzenbAoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Busicirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.