Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Epstein v. Mundweiler

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 19, 1925 · Ci-Iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-I, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Clark, McGlennon, Kays, J'J

97 N.J. Eq. 375; 127 A. 547; 12 Stock. 375; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 536

Counsel

Mr. Thomas Brown , for the complainant. Mr. Hugo Woerner , for the defendants.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van -Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, J'J. 14.

For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.