Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Mayor of Hoboken v. Babbitt

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 16, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

128 A. 266; 101 N.J.L. 403; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 247

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Breuer v. Montvale (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)
Whelan v. THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Lloyd, White, ’Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark, MoGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.