Hammel v. Van Sickle

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Hammel v. Van Sickle, 128 A. 247 (N.J. 1925)
101 N.J.L. 402; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 246
PER CURIAM.

Hammel v. Van Sickle

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
George Hammel, Appellant, v. Jesse Van Sickle, Respondent
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published