Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Hammel v. Van Sickle

Hammel v. Van Sickle
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 16, 1925 · PER CURIAM.
128 A. 247; 101 N.J.L. 402; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 246

Hammel v. Van Sickle

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.