Hammel v. Van Sickle
Hammel v. Van Sickle
128 A. 247; 101 N.J.L. 402; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 246
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Galo Coba v. Ford Motor Co (3d Cir. 2019)
- Galo Coba v. Ford Motor Co (3d Cir. 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.