Hammel v. Van Sickle
Hammel v. Van Sickle
128 A. 247; 101 N.J.L. 402; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 246
Hammel v. Van Sickle
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.