Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Gluck v. Ruiz-Urrutia

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 18, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

129 A. 130; 101 N.J.L. 558; 16 Gummere 558; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 272

Counsel

For the appellant, Maurice B. Gluck, pro se. For the respondent Rynda Development Company, Jacob Hauptman.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiaii. '

The order under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.

*560 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.