Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Arotsky v. Kropnitsky

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 19, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

127 A. 923; 101 N.J.L. 203; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 199

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Infante v. Gottesman (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
A. CRESCI & SON, INC. v. Steiker (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.