Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Keegle v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 19, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

130 A. 919; 102 N.J.L. 219; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 317

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Rozmierski v. City of Newark (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
Winne v. County of Bergen (N.J. 1956)
De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tiie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.