Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

State v. Rommel

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 9, 1925 · PER CURIAM.

130 A. 920; 102 N.J.L. 226; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 327

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.