Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925

Silent Sales Vending Co. v. Nipola Products Co.

Silent Sales Vending Co. v. Nipola Products Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 9, 1925
3 N.J. Misc. 525; 128 A. 925; 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 190

Silent Sales Vending Co. v. Nipola Products Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is the defendant’s petition for an order to take additional testimony under a rule to show cause why the plaintiff’s judgment should not be opened, which rule was discharged by this court after hearing at the last term.

*526We have considered the petition and we are constrained to think that it cannot be granted without doing violence to our settled rules and practice.

The petition is denied accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.