Silent Sales Vending Co. v. Nipola Products Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey May 9, 1925

Silent Sales Vending Co. v. Nipola Products Co., 3 N.J. Misc. 525 (N.J. 1925)

128 A. 925; 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 190

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is the defendant’s petition for an order to take additional testimony under a rule to show cause why the plaintiff’s judgment should not be opened, which rule was discharged by this court after hearing at the last term.

*526We have considered the petition and we are constrained to think that it cannot be granted without doing violence to our settled rules and practice.

The petition is denied accordingly.

Reference

Full Case Name: SILENT SALES VENDING COMPANY v. NIPOLA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Status: Published