Langheinz v. Kaltenbach

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Langheinz v. Kaltenbach, 3 N.J. Misc. 659 (N.J. 1925)
129 A. 926; 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 155

Langheinz v. Kaltenbach

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is a. rule to show .cause why a writ of mandamus should not- issue- commanding William T. Kaltenbach, build-, ing inspector of .the city -of Elizabeth,, to issue to the relator a permit to. .erect a two and a half story brick building for a drug store- and.'dwelling upon his lot on the northwest corner of Elmota and .Jersey avenue, and known as No.-130 Elmora avenue, in the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey.

. Our examination of the.record presented, and a careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, leads us to the conclusion -that- the present case- is controlled, by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Union County Development Co. v. Kaltenbach, 3 N. J. Mis. R. 341, and. Falco v. Kaltenbach, 3 Id. 333.

As all the facts are before us, a peremptory writ will be awarded, with privilege of applying for an order molding the pleadings if an appeal is desired.

Reference

Full Case Name
LOUIS LANGHEINZ, RELATOR v. WILLIAM T. KALTENBACH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH
Status
Published