Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1926

Peragallo v. Oneto

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 17, 1926 · PER CURIAM.

99 N.J. Eq. 889; 14 Stock. 889; 133 A. 920; 1926 N.J. LEXIS 508

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.