Waterman v. Taub
Waterman v. Taub
131 A. 924; 102 N.J.L. 472; 1926 N.J. LEXIS 202
Waterman v. Taub
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.