Schadel v. Honig
Schadel v. Honig
134 A. 919; 103 N.J.L. 203; 1926 N.J. LEXIS 291
Schadel v. Honig
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, KaLISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.