Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1927

Grothenhen v. Duffield

Grothenhen v. Duffield
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 7, 1927
5 N.J. Misc. 677; 137 A. 712; 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 164

Grothenhen v. Duffield

Opinion of the Court

Memokandum.

The judgment in this case was entered upon a bond and warrant of attorney. The bond was secured by a mortgage which had been foreclosed and the mortgaged lands sold under such proceedings before the action was taken leading up to the judgment now under attack.

*678Under such circumstances the proceedings are controlled by, 3 Comp. Stat., p. 3423, § 51, and it is apparent that such statute was not followed or complied with.

The rule to show cause must therefore be made absolute and the judgment set aside, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.