Sudol v. Gurtman
Sudol v. Gurtman
141 A. 922; 104 N.J.L. 668; 1928 N.J. LEXIS 290
Sudol v. Gurtman
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme ■Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenuhard, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.