Williams v. H. M.R.R. Co.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None. *Page 260

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] *Page 261