Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1928

Ulicsnik v. Dalrymple

Ulicsnik v. Dalrymple
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 15, 1928 · PER CURIAM.
140 A. 19; 103 N.J. Eq. 407; 1928 N.J. LEXIS 678

Counsel

Mr. Otto A. Stiefel and Mr. Arthur T. Vanderbilt , for the complainants. Mr. Charles M. Meyers and Mr. Hugo Woerner , for the defendants.

Ulicsnik v. Dalrymple

Opinion of the Court

Pee CtrEiAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Church.

*412 For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.