Jorgensen v. Wilberg
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- McStay v. Przychocki (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
- Sakos v. Byers (N.J. 1933)
- Scott-Huntington v. Pearson (N.J. 1933)
- Zannelle v. Pettine (R.I. 1931)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The only reason urged for making this rule absolute is that the damages are claimed to be excessive. At the trial there seems to have been an issue of fact as to whether a
The rule to show cause will, accordingly, be discharged.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.