Holzman v. Yeungling
Holzman v. Yeungling
147 A. 461; 106 N.J.L. 244; 1929 N.J. LEXIS 172
Holzman v. Yeungling
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Chief Justice, Paekee, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, White, Yah Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.