The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendant.

Our examination of the testimony in this case leads us to the conclusion that there were disputed questions of fact *888which were properly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and that hence there was no error in refusing to nonsuit the plaintiffs nor in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Rush v. Commercial Realty Co., 7 N. J. Mis. R. 337.

The judgment will be affirmed.