Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1929

Pasch ex rel. Pasch v. Stenberg

Pasch ex rel. Pasch v. Stenberg
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided December 30, 1929 · Cueiam
8 N.J. Misc. 23; 148 A. 923; 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 5

Pasch ex rel. Pasch v. Stenberg

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

A boy, while playing ball in Union City, New Jersey, was struck and injured by defendant’s automobile. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the boy’s mother for $1,000 for expenses incurred by her, and a verdict in favor of the lad for $1,250.

The plaintiffs’ rule for a new trial rests on the issue of •the adequacy of the damages in favor of the boy. In the light of the testimony of plaintiffs’ physician that he has made a complete recovery and that he merely suffers from a little toeing-in, it is unnecessary to disturb the verdict of the jury.

The rule will be discharged.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.