The decision of this case in the court below turned on findings of fact which were peculiarly within the province of the vice-chancellor, who concluded that the complainant had not shown a case entitling him to the relief prayed, and dismissed the bill. With that conclusion we agree, and the decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.