Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1930

Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark

Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 20, 1930 · PER CURIAM.
151 A. 905; 107 N.J.L. 372; 22 Gummere 372; 1930 N.J. LEXIS 301
Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We conclude that the judgment under review should be affirmed, and that it is sufficient to rest our affirmance upon the second ground contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra> without special consideration or discussion of the first ground set out in that opinion.

The judgment will accordingly be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloxd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Mo-G-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.