Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1930

Bancone v. Pinto

Bancone v. Pinto
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 20, 1930 · Chief-Justice, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells
154 A. 529; 108 N.J. Eq. 397; 1930 N.J. LEXIS 521

Counsel

“This matter came before me on motion to strike out the .answer in a bill for specific performance. I granted the motion to strike out., Mr. Ferdinand D. Masucci, for the respondents., Mr. Frederick E. Pilch, for the appellants.

Bancone v. Pinto

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons-, stated in 'the memorandum filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Teen chard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk,, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.